It’s already imbued in the code, google it!Īnd to be honest, is not vastly different to Windows 10, this isn’t Windows 7 to windows 10 or XP to Vista. They haven’t even announced(or at least I haven’t found) a statement on whether they are going to be supporting M1s natively or intend to always run through Rosetta, because if they do, guess what guys? We will be in a terrible situation, because Apple will eventually drop support for Rosetta, once there is enough adoption from companies that makes it a sensible economical decision to move forward with development, strictly on ARM. But this is happening in a couple of months guys!! I can’t possibly think, that the developers of Cubase are not running Windows 11 to address some of the issues early on to insure these apps run smoothly once the update rolls out, it is where we are going, might as well ensure our customers are happy.Ĭubase is becoming so complacent it’s scary, it feels like this is going to be ProTools all over again. Why are you being so complacent with PROFESSIONAL software?Ĭan you imagine if you bought some studio monitors that won’t turn on because of how advanced the power/electricity system is in your house? That is ridiculous.Īnd Yes, if you DON’T complain, DEVELOPERS WON’T FIX IT, mate!īesides, Yes, Win11 is at early build stage. Sorry, when did consumers started settling for a “shrug” from a developer/company? Otherwise it might be easy enough to create one or more reddit subs or Discord servers (or similar) for similarly inclined early adopter individuals.īut I would definitely prefer, if non-supported platform discussions were in a different place than supported platform conversations.
Maybe the moderators participating in this thread ( or have any additional insight on the potential of such a sub-forum here? a different specialized sub-forum - except in this case it wouldn’t be for unsupported legacy software, but for unsupported “early adopter” software combinations. I have no idea if Steinberg would want to host such a place (e.g. That being said, it might be nice, if there was a place online where early adopters could exchange observations and informal support amongst themselves. If you prefer things to “just work” and/or you count on formal or informal support, stay with officially “supported” combinations of software. When you adopt early with pre-releases or even with early “stable” releases and you encounter an issue, formal support and even most informal community helpers will shrug - and only a small number of fellow early adopters will even pay any attention to your potential cries for help.
Running pre-releases or new releases of software depends a lot on one’s own individual priorities and working style and how much empathy and formal and informal support one expects.
0 kommentar(er)
